That was enough to pique the interest of Enzo Yaksic, head of the Atypical Homicide Research Group (AHRG) at Northeastern University's School of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Yaksic said his research leads him to think that the serial-killer phenomenon is over-hyped in popular culture, and that so far this case looks more like a wannabe than a second coming of Gacy. "I would say that given the victimology, there's no direct threat to the community," he said. Most kill two victims before being caught, said Yaksic. He referred to those who kill five or more as "prolific," and he said they're rare. In fact, he said, he thinks they are growing more rare over time. "It hasn't been a very popular theory," he said. But "It's actually stunningly obvious, especially now in the information age." Yaksic said that in the '80s, study of serial killers focused on a relatively small number of cases, such as Gacy and Ted Bundy, and that might have resulted in a somewhat oversimplified understanding. Fictional characters such as Hannibal Lecter and Showtime's "Dexter" embellished that to create some templates: Serial killers are weird, lonely, frustrated losers, or amoral, psychopathic masterminds, or a little bit of both. In reality, Yaksic said, things are more complicated. If someone with the potential to become a full-fledged serial killer gets caught after his first killing, what does that make him - a serial killer whose body count stopped at one? And where do you draw the line between a serial killer who hasn't gotten started yet, and a wannabe who's never going to be? "Our field, until recently, has never been a data-driven field," Yaksic said. It's been shaped by anecdotal case studies. And wannabes are "even further removed" from a solid understanding. One reason "why the wannabes are not studied ... their competency is in question," he said. Meanwhile, Yaksic said, the world itself is becoming more data-driven. The ubiquity of cell phones makes it easier to track people. Social media might give a killer new ways to lure a victim, but it also makes it harder for people to simply disappear. Connectivity in general makes it easier for authorities to spot a pattern of killings spread across multiple jurisdictions. Classic serial killers remain among the most difficult cases to crack, Yaksic said, in part because they target strangers. But in some ways the risks have gone up, and "offenders definitely calculate the risk involved." He said that if the risk of getting caught is high enough, a potential serial killer might simply seek other forms of release. He said he thinks some find relief through intense role-playing - something perhaps comparable to a specialized sexual fetish. "Many of them don't actually need to kill in order to get what they want, which is gratification," Yaksic said. Yaksic's theories aren't all new, by any means. The FBI published a "Serial Murder" handbook in 2008. Its introduction says: "Serial murder is a relatively rare event, estimated to comprise less than one percent of all murders committed in any given year. However, there is a macabre interest in the topic that far exceeds its scope and has generated countless articles, books, and movies." After referencing Jack the Ripper, the Green River Killer, Ted Bundy and "Silence of the Lambs," it says that "much of the general public's knowledge concerning serial murder is a product of Hollywood productions." To that, Yaksic adds a modern refinement: Podcasts catering to the popular interest in real or purported serial killers. "Some of these individuals are directly responsible for promulgating the myths," he said. Still, much remains unknown, both in the Sebastian case and in the larger matter of serial killings. Sebastian could turn out to have a darker past than anyone has yet realized, though Yaksic said he finds it unlikely. The unknown allows for speculation, and it allows for doubt. It allows for the possibility that serial killers are out there, hidden in the "dark figures" of unreported crime. Yaksic doubts it, but it remains a difficult argument to kill. "It's impossible to prove," he said.